Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comet (online retailer)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Comet (retailer)#Comet.co.uk (2020–present). Ed [talk[OMT] 02:48, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Comet (online retailer)]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Comet (online retailer)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Comet (online retailer)}})

I redirected this to the article about the older company[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comet_(online_retailer)&oldid=1284727145], but was reverted. Nothing more needs to be said than what is already present at the target Comet (retailer)#Comet (online retailer), no separate article is warranted. Fram (talk) 10:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:Delete agree with above, this is a textbook WP:BADFORK. Orange sticker (talk) 10:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

:Delete as WP:BADFORK especially as the two businesses are in the same sector and use the same branding. Other similar situations use a single article, for example Borders (retailer) includes the current UAE franchise. On the other hand, Debenhams (online retailer) and Debenhams both exist as articles, but I can't see how a Comet (online retailer) article could develop much further, assuming it doesn't have a notable impact on its industry. --Northernhenge (talk) 12:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.