Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comodo Korugan

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 03:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

=[[Comodo Korugan]]=

:{{la|Comodo Korugan}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comodo_Korugan Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Comodo Korugan}})

No evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 20:55, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Delete - ~~software~~ 'hardware' article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Refs provided are a forum and a company site, not WP:RS, and a search turned up no significant independent coverage.Dialectric (talk) 02:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Retain; - Its a hardware resource and it is new product from trusted brand, I am surprised to see that the article is under consideration for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamahendric (talk • contribs) 15:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

::Notability is not inherited, so the brand does not in itself establish notability.Dialectric (talk) 17:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep: - Hope you might consider dailysabah Turkish magazine Ekonomist has a trusted source. I recommend to remove AFD request on this article. (Williamahendric (talk) 14:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC))

::Williamahendric, you may make multiple comments on afd discussions, but are only allowed one vote. You have voted twice on this afd. Please change one of the votes to a comment.Dialectric (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Delete I have already deleted a half-dozen spammy articles about individual Comodo products. CorporateM (Talk) 05:34, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep Author shared the article in stub and it has base references & details, why should we delete instead of edit? It is not necessary to know what it is brand or anything. Wiki help people in providing details through trusted citation, Improve it instead of delete Mathewherz (talk) 08:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC)— Mathewherz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.