Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Cantonese and Standard Chinese

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Comparison of Cantonese and Standard Chinese}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_Cantonese_and_Standard_Chinese Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Comparison of Cantonese and Standard Chinese}})

We already have an article called Varieties of Chinese. I see more hope for expansion on that one than creating a useless one, focusing specifically on "Cantonese" (pretty sure it's referring to HK Cantonese) and Standard Vernacular Chinese. SSS (talk) 01:54, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

:: However, I think some links on that page should be saved and transferred onto the Varieties of Chinese page. SSS (talk) 02:04, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

• Weak Delete Any student of Chinese can tell you this is a regular topic of discussion, all the same I cannot find any sources showing notability, and unless any are found deletion is the only way to go. FOARP (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
• Delete Almost reads like WP:OR. D4iNa4 (talk) 13:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.