Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compeat Restaurant Management Systems

:{{la|Compeat Restaurant Management Systems}} ([{{fullurl:Compeat Restaurant Management Systems|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compeat Restaurant Management Systems}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

fails WP:CORP, lacks third party coverage [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2000&as_user_hdate=2009%2F12&q=%22Compeat+Restaurant+Management+Systems%22&scoring=r&hl=en&ned=us&q=%22Compeat+Restaurant+Management+Systems%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go]. LibStar (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete or Cut down Reads a little too much like an 'about us' page with few references. Parkerparked (talk) 16:23, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:34, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

:It's one or the other, Parkerparked: "Delete" means delete, and "cut down" means keep.

• Delete. "Notability" seems to be derived mainly from the fact that they got hit by Katrina. Drmies (talk) 19:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

:So? If they're notable, they're notable. Groomtech (talk) 06:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BJ^Talk 04:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compeat Restaurant Management Systems||}}

• Delete: sounds to be self-promotional. Alexius08 (talk) 10:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.