Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conjurers Encrypter

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

=[[Conjurers Encrypter]]=

:{{la|Conjurers Encrypter}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Conjurers_Encrypter Stats])

:({{Find sources|Conjurers Encrypter}})

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Sources offered are either WP:PRIMARY or unreliable and thus unhelpful. Googling turned up nothing useful. Product appears to be a WP:run-of-the-mill encryption application. See also related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FireCMD. Msnicki (talk) 14:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar · · 14:24, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete. No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete (same issues as FireCMD) TEDickey (talk) 00:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete per nom. No indication of notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 11:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete - no coverage in reliable sources. The sources provided in the article indciate reviews in Softpedia and Cnet but an inspection of the sources show a description in a directory entry for a download link. -- Whpq (talk) 16:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.