Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor van Buuren

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Connor van Buuren}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor van Buuren}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Connor van Buuren}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Connor van Buuren]]=

:{{la|1=Connor van Buuren}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Connor van Buuren}})

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 02:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and South Africa. JTtheOG (talk) 02:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete Looks to be a case of WP:TOOSOON on my part, would have passed the old WP:NRU guidelines. Lots of coverage, but probably not enough for a WP:GNG pass. No suitable redirect here per WP:ATD either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.