Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conor & Jay
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 07:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
=[[Conor & Jay]]=
:{{la|Conor & Jay}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Conor & Jay}})
Article, parked entirely on unreliable sources that cannot support notability at all, about a band whose only substantive claim of notability is having placed some songs in a video game. While that would potentially be a valid claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC #10 if it were sourced properly, no criterion in NMUSIC ever grants an automatic notability freebie just because its passage is claimed — NMUSIC is not passed until reliable source coverage properly verifies the accuracy of the claim. Delete, without prejudice against recreation if real RS coverage ever materializes. Bearcat (talk) 04:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 05:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 05:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and I was planning to nominate it when I first saw and reviewed it at NPP, nothing including my searches found anything to suggest considerably better. SwisterTwister talk 05:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as failing WP:GNG. I am no closely familiar with artist/band sourcing, but it doesn't appear like there are any in-depth reliable independent hits to satisfy GNG. WP:BAND#10 does not seem to be well fulfilled with being only one of the song-writers for a game with a large selection of songs. I agree with nom that this shouldn't give a notability "freebie". At present there is no material (that has been found) to write an article. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 18:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.