Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquest of the Nanda Empire

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 00:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Conquest of the Nanda Empire]]=

:{{la|Conquest of the Nanda Empire}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Conquest_of_the_Nanda_Empire Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Conquest of the Nanda Empire}})

Despite efforts by various editors since this article was created in 2011, this article is very poorly written and provides little meaningful information about the topic. It seems to be primarily made up of original research, lacks reliable sources and is not neutral in its tone. Chewings72 (talk) 11:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Keep - I've expanded the article and sources. The war/conquest was a significant event or group of events in the ancient world and seems to me to very much merit an article in Wikipedia. After my initial edit, tone and NPOV issues remain, especially with the bits I've taken from the original article. I'll try to edit these a bit more. Smmurphy^(Talk) 17:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to Chandragupta Maurya -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count]) 18:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Support last suggestion: while the subject is clearly significant (though not something I know about) what he have appears merely to be a copy and paste fork of that article. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
For what it is worth, a copy-paste performed (and credited in the edit summary) May 7 was from the recently updated Conquest of the Nanda Empire article to Chandragupta Maurya, and not the other way around. Smmurphy^(Talk) 02:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Support merge and redirect. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 00:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep - Given the excellent and complete rewrite by Smmurphy, I have no issues in seeing what is now effectively a new article kept.Chewings72 (talk) 02:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Keep. Event is notable, article has been improved. Srnec (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep, a notable topic, worthy of an article, meets WP:GNG, thanks to article improvements by {{u|Smmurphy}}. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep. The article has been improved since the nomination and now shows notability. Anarchyte (work | talk) 23:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.