Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conserveira do Sul

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Conserveira do Sul}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conserveira do Sul}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Conserveira do Sul}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Conserveira do Sul]]=

:{{la|1=Conserveira do Sul}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Conserveira do Sul}})

Doesn't meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 16:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and Portugal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete. A few web searches did not turn up anything likely to lead to reliable sources, so I do not think this meets our general notability guidelines. Malinaccier (talk) 14:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.