Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Considering Disability Journal

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

=[[Considering Disability Journal]]=

:{{la|Considering Disability Journal}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Considering_Disability_Journal Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Considering Disability Journal}})

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG Randykitty (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Keep: Further independent sources added, indexing in progress with journal. Notable as is only journal in field for entry-level studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.196.147 (talk) 08:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC) — 82.46.196.147 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

:*Comment There are [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Considering_Disability_Journal&oldid=688719370 currently] 4 sources in the article. #1 is an email announcement and call for papers. Not a reliable source]) contributing to notability. #2 is an in-passing mention on the website of the founder's university: not independent and not in-depth. #3 is a company profile on a website that [http://www.endole.co.uk/ takes its information from public sources and doesn't guarantee it is correct]. Not a reliable source and not in-depth coverage. #4 is the journal's own website. Unfortunately, none of these sources contributes to notability. Being the "only journal in field for entry-level studies" is not something mentioned in either [[WP:NJOURNALS or WP:GNG. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 13:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete per Randykitty, it's simply not notable. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 21:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete until a better article is available. SwisterTwister talk 08:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.