Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constantine Costa Kapothanasis
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted by Wizardman (per G12, no prejudice against recreation) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
=[[Constantine Costa Kapothanasis]]=
:{{la|Constantine Costa Kapothanasis}} – (
:({{Find sources|Constantine Costa Kapothanasis}})
Article is about a baseball player lacking significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. In looking at whether specific notability for baseball, the only criteria he might qualify under is competing in a major international competition is if one considers the European Baseball Championships to be such a competition as he was on the Greek national team. Whpq (talk) 22:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as copyvio of [http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Costa_Kapothanasis Baseball Reference Bullpen]. Even though the bullpen is a wiki, we are not allowed to directly copy articles from it because it uses different licensing rules. Spanneraol (talk) 03:30, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The wording can easily be changed to avoid any copyright problems. The European Cup is the biggest baseball tournament in Europe, so I'd say it is "major." Alex (talk) 12:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete with no prejudice against recreating without copyvios, per Spanneraol. After removing the copyvios, there would be almost nothing left of the article. So it would be preferable to delete and start from scratch (assuming he is notable) then to revise what is here and leave the copyvios in the history where they may be restored at some point. Rlendog (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.