Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content management systems for school websites

:{{la|Content management systems for school websites}} ([{{fullurl:Content management systems for school websites|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content management systems for school websites}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unnecessary article full of opinion, no objective information. Nothing here that is not in the content management system article that is not opinion — Frecklefσσt | Talk 19:41, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to content management system. Began as spam. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• I've tried to remove all of the biased language. I think this page has valuable content that isn't on the content management system page. Trzos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.93.88.94 (talk) 14:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. Please specify a) what this "valuable content" is and b) why this "valuable content" cannot be added to the content management system article. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 14:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• 'Comment'. Please be patient with me, I am new to editing in this fashion. I use a Content management systems for school websites. I was shocked by the idea of deleting this article, but from reading these comments my current opinion is that this should be a separate section under the content management system article. My only hesitation is that this section may then dominate that article, which it should not. Content management systems are used in many areas of webdevelopment; schools are only a small portion of their use. --Ddoering (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as original research and unsourced opinion. Basically the entire article is a list of things an editor thinks that a CMS for a school might include. --MCB (talk) 06:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as per MCB. Material specifically on school websites may be appropriate in the content management system article, but there's nothing sourced here to merge. I don't believe a redirect is necessary, as I don't see this being a likely search term. I would imagine that those wanting to know about content management systems will start in the parent article to begin with. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete this and work on the prose within the content management system article. Blast Ulna (talk) 13:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.