Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contify

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Contify]]=

:{{la|Contify}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Contify Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Contify}})

Promotional article about a company that fails NCORP. Apart from a short article on ZDNet [https://www.zdnet.com/article/indias-contify-dispenses-knowledge-in-the-cloud/], there is no SIGCOV in reliable sources. The article has been edited by accounts like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Marketing_Contify User:Marketing Contify] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ankur_marketer User:Ankur marketer]. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete - per nom rationale Ealuscerwen (talk) 01:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Clearly fails WP:NCORP for insufficient coverage to merit inclusion. BD2412 T 03:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete: A company going about its business, recently [https://www.bignewsnetwork.com/news/264140158/contify-launches-new-mobile-experience announcing a mobile app], but participation in start-up events and the non-notable award listings which are summarised in the article are insufficient for :WP:CORPDEPTH, as is the brief ZDNet summary of the firm's proposition. Fails :WP:NCORP and there is no article on the Athena Information Solutions parent, so no suitable redirect target. AllyD (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.