Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoolStreaming

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[CoolStreaming]]=

:{{la|CoolStreaming}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CoolStreaming Stats])

:({{Find sources|CoolStreaming}})

Non-notable streaming research project, apparently based out of cse.ust.hk. All the references, in the English and Italian articles and all the references in google appear to be written by people associated with cse.ust.hk or commercial operations using this trademark. No evidence of independent coverage. Lots of the non-independent links talk about it being in 'beta' so it may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Snow Keep, per [http://punto-informatico.it/2033733/PI/Interviste/coolstreaming-p2p-tv-italiana-assalto.aspx], [http://punto-informatico.it/1689400/PI/News/coolstreaming-iptv-batte-nuove-strade.aspx], [http://corriere.com/2008/08/29/tutti-davanti-alla-tv-e-se-va-male-c%C2%92e-il-web/], [http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2006/09/25/un-solo-sito-per-vedere-tante-reti.html], [http://archivio.panorama.it/www-la-tv-te-la-fai-tu], [http://www.megalab.it/638], [http://www.digital-sat.it/ds-news.php?id=17479], [http://www.webnews.it/2006/03/31/coolstreaming-il-reato-non-sussiste/] and several dozens of additional sources. None of these sources is affiliated to the software's creators, and none of these sources talks about it being in 'beta'. Cavarrone (talk) 08:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 14:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hue Sat Lum 13:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.