Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooper Green Mercy Hospital

:{{la|Cooper Green Mercy Hospital}} ([{{fullurl:Cooper Green Mercy Hospital|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooper Green Mercy Hospital}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails to pass WP:N Irunongames{{•}}play 23:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - Google News search shows significant media coverage from reliable sources. Per Ardua (talk) 00:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems like a notable institution to me. I expanded the article using an entry I wrote for Bhamwiki. --Dystopos (talk) 13:28, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - Although not cited in the article, it has significant coverage from independent, reliable sources. Altairisfar_talk 14:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

• Keep Keep, refimprove. Certainly notable  Chzz  ►  15:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Although it's true that the overwhelming majority of those Google news sources are from the news in Birmingham, Alabama (duh), there are some non-local sources [http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-10126059_ITM] that note the Balm of Gilead as an innovative program. But let's face it, most 300 bed hospitals would not pass the notability test. Mandsford (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.