Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooperative Bank of Tarlac

:{{la|Cooperative Bank of Tarlac}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cooperative_Bank_of_Tarlac Stats])

:({{Find sources|Cooperative Bank of Tarlac}})

Notability not established per WP:COMPANY. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 11:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy close. WP:COMPANY states that "Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." It appears this was not met, if that has been done, they a 2nd nomination may be pursued. –HTD 12:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
• [https://www.google.com/search?q=cooperative+bank+of+tarlac&oq=cooperative+bank+of+tarlac&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j0l4.3163j0j7&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=cooperative+bank+of+tarlac&safe=off&tbm=nws Oh yeah], [https://www.google.com/search?q=cooperative+bank+of+tarlac&oq=cooperative+bank+of+tarlac&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j0l4.3163j0j7&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#q=cooperative+bank+of+tarlac&safe=off&tbm=bks lots of sources here]. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 12:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
• Close/Keep AFD isn't used as a clean up, Also per HTD. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 18:56, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
• This isn't about cleanup. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 12:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
• Close/Keep as above. This entire campaign has been extremely wasteful of editor time. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
• Yeah, I can really see how this has been wasteful for you particularly. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 12:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

:::Yes, absolutely right, because I've had to look up sources on 20 Philippine Banks and add them where needed, it has been extremely time consuming. Why couldn't you use Google Books and Google News yourself and do this - instead of using bytes to add comments like the above? In ictu oculi (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

::::The only time you've ever edited this article is to deprod saying "bulk prod should not be used". Also, if all of this was too time-consuming for you then why did you even bother? Have you seen my above comment with links to google books and news searches? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 06:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

:::::As above, I looked up all 20 banks before opposing your AFDs. Yes I've seen your [lots of sources here] post. You seem to be viewing this as some kind of adversarial game whereby it is your job to make sarcastic taunts and other editors' job to run around rescuing articles you prod and AFD. I hope this is not the case. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

::::::Actually, they are not deemed notable which is why I nominated them. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 01:32, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Comment: The comments saying "Speedy keep" or "close" are not actual speedy keep criterion. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 09:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.