Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Correspondence between Miguel Miramón and Concepción Lombardo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miguel Miramón. And merge any relevant content from history. Sandstein 08:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Correspondence between Miguel Miramón and Concepción Lombardo]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistolary between Miguel Miramón and Concepción Lombardo}}

:{{la|Correspondence between Miguel Miramón and Concepción Lombardo}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Correspondence_between_Miguel_Miram%C3%B3n_and_Concepci%C3%B3n_Lombardo Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Correspondence between Miguel Miramón and Concepción Lombardo}})

WP:PLOT, there's no reason for this article. The letters could get a small mention in the Miguel Miramon article, but no reason to have multiple quotes. Rusf10 (talk) 02:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

  • Merge to Miguel Miramón (which is rather short and should be expanded significantly in general). The question, in my mind, is whether this collection meets WP:NBOOK - from what I see (in the sourcing in the article, and in a BEFORE) - this does not seem to be the case, though it is of some importance.Icewhiz (talk) 07:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete anything of importance can be said in the article on Miramón.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:46, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Merge (not delete) -- The letters are probably an important historical source, though I do not know. Nevertheless, we do not need a separate article on the published collection. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.