Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Correspondence poker

:{{la|Correspondence poker}} ([{{fullurl:Correspondence poker|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Correspondence poker}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No sources to verify. No real claim of notability. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 21:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete An interesting idea, but it sounds WP:MADEUP. Perhaps madeup [http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/15/poker-theory/correspondence-poker-540847/ here] ? No indication of notability. Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 20:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. There is a [http://www.correspondencepoker.com/ site] that offers it, with a grand total of 48 players playing right now in its "open beta test". Non-notable and very likely to stay that way. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Could not find any suitable sources on Google (majority of hits seemed to be "does anyone offer CP"), and as none have been supplied in the article, it's not verifiable.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.