Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Singles (newspaper)

=[[Country Singles (newspaper)]]=

:{{la|Country Singles (newspaper)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Singles (newspaper)}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Country Singles (newspaper)}})

no indication of notability. The court cases do not mention the paper, the 21balloons web site dose not mention any documentary about it. noq (talk) 08:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Strong delete Not even mentioned in any of the sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 15:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep I've addressed comments above. The paper changed its name - court cases do in fact refer to this paper. I edited article to clarify this. The last reference is in fact a dead link, my error, I've deleted reference until I find correct one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfrphoto (talkcontribs) 04:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Update I decided in-depth legal discussion belonged on publisher page so I put it there at Jacobsen_Publishing Mfrphoto (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete. Does not meet general notability requirements. It is not widely quoted and there are very few - if any - secondary sources that quote the magazine. The legal case mentioned in the article, if notable, should be a stand-alone entry, but regardless of the case's notability, the publication in question does not inherit notability from the case. Wikipeterproject (talk) 19:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.