Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Court process Australia

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. As well as the discussion below, this met several of the speedy deletion criteria (eg, Criterion 10 and sort-of Criteria G1 and A1. Nick-D (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

=[[Court process Australia]]=

:{{la|Court process Australia}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Court process Australia}})

Article seems to be written as if author wants to expose something. Wikipedia is not wikileaks, or a blog to write personal opinions and observations on. WP:WIKILEAKS and WP:NOTBLOG Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 04:36, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy delete unsourced, incoherent pov rant Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete Though note that I have attempted to engage the edtior. Thorncrag 21:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete: Not sure what it is. Maybe set as a redirect to Law of Australia? --LauraHale (talk) 02:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.