Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cow evolution

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

=[[Cow evolution]]=

:{{la|Cow evolution}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cow_evolution Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Cow evolution}})

I do not believe that this subject satisfies WP:GNG. Five references – none of them to reliable, independent sources. A web search comes up with nothing authoritative, and there is no evidence that the company is notable in its own right. Super Mario Man–Talk 20:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources [https://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=003516479746865699832:leawcwkqifq custom Google search]. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{tl|ping}} me. czar 18:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete Clearly fails notability test with basically no third party reliable sources. Steven Walling • talk 02:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Not a notable game. Cow Evolution is only mentioned in passing in the custom WP:VG/RS Google [https://cse.google.com/cse/home?cx=003516479746865699832:leawcwkqifq search engine]. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.