Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Dillon (5th nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. Daniel (talk) 05:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Craig Dillon]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Dillon}}

:{{la|Craig Dillon}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Craig Dillon}})

Almost all references provided are trivial mentions where his company Westminster Digital is the main subject. Nexus000 (talk) 00:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Delete and apply salt. I am not seeing sustained in-depth coverage of this guy. fails GNG JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 01:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment This article has been nominated for deletion 4 times previously. For 3 of them, the consensus was to delete. For the other, there was no consensus. Given this article has removed well-documented but unfavourable information on the subject [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/youtube-vlogger-craig-dillon-pursues-defamation-action-after-rape-allegation-9854713.html 1] [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/craig-dillon-interview-youtube-vlogger-seeking-protection-those-accused-sex-attacks-online-after-being-accused-himself-10219779.html 2] [https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/craig-dillon-speaks-out-alleged-abuse-claims/ 3] [https://teneightymagazine.com/2014/11/14/craig-dillon-thomas-corbett/ 4], I suspect this page has a WP:COI from either himself or his social media agency. Nexus000 (talk) 01:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.