Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craigh Barboza
=[[Craigh Barboza]]=
:{{la|Craigh Barboza}} ([{{fullurl:Craigh Barboza|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craigh Barboza}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
BLP with no references Jared555 (talk) 20:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Strong delete Even what's asserted doesn't make the cut. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. A senior editor of a national publication might indeed meet the notability criteria, if he has been the subject of significant writing in independent sources. But the only sources cited are works edited and/or written by this person, and none that have been written about him and his significance in journalism, so this article doesn't include what it needs to meet the criteria. I wasn't able to find writing about him with my search of google, though I did find some things by him. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Self promoting and the article was created by a user with the same name which strongly suggest that it's him and goes against the Wikipedia:Guidelines. Tree Karma (talk) 03:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.