Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crimeface

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 12:36, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Crimeface]]=

:{{la|Crimeface}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Crimeface}})

Non-notable film/advert. Links to Krishna Stott, who seems to also be non-notable. Lugnuts (talk) 17:12, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

:Keep: Awards imply notability. Also has several 3rd party coverage. Clearly meet criteria 1 and 2 of WP:Web [http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?media_id=97&season=12#film_experimental See awards here].--TParis00ap (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

:Delete. Non-notable. No independent sources.--Karljoos (talk) 18:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

::Wikipedia:So_fix_it. No independent sources does not determine notability. Google it. But if you insist, I've added four 3rd party independant sources.--TParis00ap (talk) 20:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

:Comment. The "no sources" is an "extra" (as in "on the house"). I think the subject is non-notable.--Karljoos (talk) 20:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

:Comment I've wikified the page, added 4 independant sources, external links, and a link from another article.--TParis00ap (talk) 21:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Keep Notability established by awards and substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Keep: Per ChildofMidnight. Joe Chill (talk) 01:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Keep per the proper de-prodding by User:Jclemens, its having been searchably notable prior to nomination, and per improvements after-nomination by User:TParis00ap. Good job. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 08:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.