Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristian Ciocan
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Cristian Ciocan]]=
:{{la|1=Cristian Ciocan}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Cristian Ciocan}})
BLP with no indication of notability. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they {{pipe}} talk) 04:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Philosophy, and Romania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Pass of WP:Prof#C1 in a very low-cited field. May pass WP:Prof#C8 with a rather recent journal. The nominator has been on a deletion spree today. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC).
- Keep per WP:NACADEMIC #8. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. I think the case for WP:PROF#C8 as founding co-editor-in-chief of a notable journal is clearest, but he also has a weak case for WP:AUTHOR through multiple published book reviews [https://www.jstor.org/stable/26632078] [https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-7529a520-63bf-47f3-8ddf-55f8f9a66b46] [https://doi.org/10.3917/etu.4237.0123l]. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 03:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.