Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristin E. Kearns

:{{la|Cristin E. Kearns}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cristin_E._Kearns Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Cristin E. Kearns}})

Article about a postdoctoral fellow. I don't think she notability quite yet. Single mention in the New York Times. Fails to assert notability as per WP:BIO and subsequently WP:GNG scope_creep (talk) 11:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete, WP:TOOSOON for WP:PROF. The brief mention in the NYT article is also not enough for WP:GNG, because it's not in-depth enough and is only one source and one event. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete 6 published works is way to few in this field to be notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. Pass of WP:Prof not to be found. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC).
• Delete - Fails WP:PROF. -- Dane ^talk 01:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.