Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical inventory

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Critical inventory]]=

:{{la|Critical inventory}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Critical inventory}})

WP:OR Zzaffuto118 (talk) 01:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

:Comment There was NO reason to take this to AfD, especially when you used the same reason as the prodder. Nobody had removed the PROD. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 01:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

:Delete - WP:NOTADICTIONARY. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete Clear business dicdef. Unreferenced/OR in addition. I don't understand why the nom didn't simply let the PROD run its course or endorse that prod? OSborn^arf_contribs. 03:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Delete or Transfer to Wiktionary. Buckshot06 (talk) 19:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Weak Delete as a stub WP:STUB and because the article does not include Primary, secondary and tertiary sources WP: PSTS. The article does have potential WP:POTENTIAL and appears to be note worthy WP:N but would need verification WP:VERIFY.--User:Warrior777 (talk) 01:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.