Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crosswalk Project

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Crosswalk Project}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crosswalk Project}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Crosswalk Project}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 00:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Crosswalk Project]]=

:{{la|1=Crosswalk Project}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Crosswalk Project}})

Not notable defunct web app; github as the main source Insillaciv (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Delete Article doesn't explain use of the project or its assets at all for a regular web user or Wikipedia reader, much less in simple language. Nathannah • (chatter) 23:49, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.