Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crumber (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 00:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Crumber]]=

AfDs for this article:

:{{la|Crumber}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Crumber_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Crumber}})

Unnecessary article. Multiple issues including orphanage, and needs more links. Not to criticize, but I believe a table cloth could do a better job. Kevin 12xd (contribs) 02:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

*Delete for what has been said above. Inline citations needed from third-party sources.--DrumstickJuggler (talk) 03:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep. The table crumber may be humble but it is ubiquitous, important to the art of fine dining service, and notable, as found by the consensus in the 2006 AfD. Unfortunately no one added sources to the article back then, but it turns out that such sources do exist, such as a 2010 Baltimore Sun article that tells the interesting story of the invention, patenting, and manufacture of the modern Baltimore-born-and-made product.[http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2010-12-30/business/bs-bz-master-made-in-baltimore-20101230_1_tulkoff-food-products-small-manufacturers-horseradish/2] I've added some information and a few sources to start. --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep per new additions to the page.--DrumstickJuggler (talk) 03:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep Sources added by Arxiloxos show notability. It's true that the article needs more links to it and links to other articles, but these are surmountable problems WP:SURMOUNTABLE and the article should be kept. --Mark viking (talk) 05:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep Unnecessary nomination. Warden (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Keep, due to additional sources. The article has sufficient bluelinks, and I de-orphaned it with an incoming link. Miniapolis 21:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.