Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cullen Sheehan
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 14:14, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
=[[:Cullen Sheehan]]=
:{{la|1=Cullen Sheehan}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Cullen Sheehan}})
WP:BLP of a lobbyist, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for lobbyists. The attempted notability claim here is that he had political consultancy roles, like campaign manager or chief of staff, before registering as a lobbyist, but those are completely unsourced for the purposes of turning them into notability claims, while his work as a lobbyist is referenced entirely to a single directory entry that isn't support for notability. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG on third-party reliable source coverage in media about him and his work. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I did find [https://www.mprnews.org/story/2011/12/21/koch-staffer] but again it is not an in-depth source about Sheehan. LizardJr8 (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Newspaper coverage has about as much as the comment above found [https://books.google.ca/books?id=4rVGAAAAIBAJ&lpg=PA3&dq=%22Cullen%20Sheehan%22&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q=%22Cullen%20Sheehan%22&f=false], brief mentions but nothing for notability. I don't see anything else we can use for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: It's easy to find this person is/was a lobbyist as mentioned in the article. But as far as what he achieved in that capacity, just isn't available. — Maile (talk) 15:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Needs cleanup to stub level. Kellpb93ke (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC) — Kellpb93ke (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
::Please provide sources to support notability Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kablammo (talk) 16:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.