Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuneo family

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor characters in The Godfather series. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Cuneo family]]=

:{{la|Cuneo family}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cuneo_family Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Cuneo family}})

This does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Keep This does not establish a reason to delete. Andrew D. (talk) 10:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

:*{{Ping|Andrew Davidson}} Do you have any actual reasoning or are you being purposefully contrary? The reasoning for the content's removal is perfectly legitimate, so please provide reliable sources if you think the assertion is false. TTN (talk) 19:33, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

::* The nominator is the one who has to make a case and currently I'm only seeing a vague wave. My !vote stands. Andrew D. (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

:::*Then you're just being purposefully contrary and have no actual opinion. Considering that you've commented on three of my AfDs now, you know full well the position and purpose of the proposal, but fail to actually comment on it based on its actual merit. TTN (talk) 23:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Redirect to a more suitable Godfather article. Article's pretty short, so if it stays that way, it's reasonable to assume all the pertinent information would be included in any article that this one could redirect to. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 21:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 07:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Merge - Completely unreferenced article. A quick search only led me to a source which is itself an unreferenced Wiki. Exemplo347 (talk) 07:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
  • redirect- Entirely unreferenced article on a subject that's not even notable in the work of fiction, let alone having any real-world notability. The main article already covers this subject in sufficient detail. Reyk YO! 08:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.