Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curotek

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Curotek}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curotek}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Curotek}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Joyous! Noise! 21:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Curotek]]=

:{{la|1=Curotek}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Curotek}})

non notable local company. the cited references are trivial coverage on Curotek and fails NCORP. Graywalls (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Technology, and Oregon. Graywalls (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Delete - nothing out there. They haven't even made it into the local newspaper, The Oregonian. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 21:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.