Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis Good

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

=[[Curtis Good]]=

:{{la|Curtis Good}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Curtis Good}})

Non-notable young footballer who fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. PROD was removed by an IP with no reason given. GiantSnowman 09:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  • edit: Delete/Userfy per not yet having made an appearance Speedy Keep — Appears in fully professional A-League per WP:NFOOTBALL Jebus989✰ 09:18, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

:*But he hasn't actually played a game, failing WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 09:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete As per WP:CRYSTAL, we cannot pre-empt notability before it has been established. He might not ever play a game, even if currently signed.Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 14:41, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - He fails his own Notability guideline, he never played a game before, thus he is not notable. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 15:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:FOOTYN. Recreate if and when he ever makes his debut for Melbourne Heart. --Jimbo[online] 13:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep, He has signed a senior contract and is therefore a professional sportsman. --Simione001[online] 15:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simione001 (talk • contribs)
  • He has not played a professional match though, and theoretically may never, therefore he doesn't meet the requirement -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.