Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CyberSafe

=[[CyberSafe]]=

:{{la|CyberSafe}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CyberSafe Stats])

:({{Find sources|CyberSafe}})

This article is not about the specific subject, and gives no evidence of notability for it; rather, the contents is a general article on computer encryption., of which we have adequate coverage.

We've usually regarded this sort of writing as promotional, because its only real purpose is to introduce an otherwise unsupported article under the name of the product DGG ( talk ) 21:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete: Agree with DGG, this "article" is a WP:ADVERT. While the concept of a digital vault does exist, this article is just trying to push one implementation. -- BenTels (talk) 00:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

:{{#if:yes|Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. |{{error|This template must be substituted!}}}} • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep: Disagree. There's a lot of good research here. I think this article should be improved, not deleted. Limemine (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep: The article has a great references section and is well-written. The article should stay. Unhmba (talk) 22:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Unhmba (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.