Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberpunk Educator

=[[Cyberpunk Educator]]=

:{{la|Cyberpunk Educator}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyberpunk Educator}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Cyberpunk Educator}})

Over two years with no sources added. Aside from a few fansites, forums and lots of torrents, I find no reliable sources that prove this has achieved any significant notability magnius (talk) 20:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - I filled in the one reference, and tried to find more than the one review, but a quick online search does not help much. I'm far from an expert on this. Please, can someone else help? Bearian (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{tl|Rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong soliloquize 21:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Note The article under discussion here was tagged for {{tl|Rescue}} by anonymous SPA 64.255.164.103.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/64.255.164.103] Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC) 05:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. SnottyWong soliloquize 21:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete - per WP:NFILM. No significant coverage in reliable sources. A single review is pretty routine for film like this. Claritas § 15:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.