Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus–Iceland relations

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BJTalk 00:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

=[[Cyprus–Iceland relations]]=

:{{la|Cyprus–Iceland relations}} ([{{fullurl:Cyprus–Iceland relations|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus–Iceland relations}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

another random laughable combination from the obsessive creator. non resident embassies. there is not even 1 single agreement between these 2 countries according to Cypriot foreign ministry [http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/mfa2006.nsf/All/070DB264D7DFE0BBC22571B1002B90E6?OpenDocument] LibStar (talk) 05:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - they're both islands, but not much more can be said about this pairing. - Biruitorul Talk 06:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable intersection. Stifle (talk) 10:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails notability and not a directory or random collection of information. Better to have 200 sections or articles on "Foreign relations of ..." for each sovereign nation than about 20,000 random pairings which merely regurgitate information from the websites of the foreign ministries, and which will quickly become stale and outdated.
  • Delete per my usual standards; no major bilateral contacts. Bearian (talk) 00:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. --BlueSquadronRaven 17:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Closing administrator please note this editor has copy and pasted the exact same delete reason on Over forty other AfDs today. Two weeks ago he copy and pasted the same reason in 15 AfDs in less than 3 minutes. Ikip (talk) 09:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

{{user:ikip/99|Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bilateral relations}}

  • Keep no attempt to WP:PRESERVE or WP:BEFORE Ikip (talk) 02:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
  • And how would you know that? Please address the article on the merits. - Biruitorul Talk 02:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete i find no reilable sources that discuss this obscure bilateral relationship, let alone multiple non-trivial mentions about the relatinship. Clear delete.Bali ultimate (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.