Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus–Vietnam relations

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja247 18:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

=[[Cyprus–Vietnam relations]]=

:{{la|Cyprus–Vietnam relations}} ([{{fullurl:Cyprus–Vietnam relations|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyprus–Vietnam relations}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Another X-Y country relations article that fails WP:N. tempodivalse [☎] 23:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - no embassies, no historic ties, nothing to indicate anything of substance here. - Biruitorul Talk 01:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Cyprus historically doesn't even have good relations with itself. Having two non-resident ambassadors is hardly notable. --BlueSquadronRaven 14:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep The List of sovereign states shows there are 203, therefore (203*202)/2 (=20503) potential articles with the title "X–Y relations", counting "Y-X relations" with it. It looks like User:Plumoyr is going around, like Johnny Appleseed creating as many as possible, as stubs, in the hope others will add onto them. I'm not opposed to this activity, as those subjects are unlikely to be examined, in detail, in most articles on individual countries. Disc space is cheap. Human time and effort are not. -65.246.126.130 (talk) 20:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • The WP:NOHARM argument doesn't really fly. - Biruitorul Talk 15:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • :This is a Mbhiii sockpuppet. Uncle G (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete. I'm not able to find much on this, but experience has shown me that it's difficult to find the right kind of sources with a simple google or Lexis search. Thus, if anyone turns up some sources, I will switch to keep. Cool3 (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong delete, non resident ambassadors, the extent of bilateral relations is shown here [http://www.mofa.gov.vn/en/cn_vakv/euro/nr040921142057] LibStar (talk) 11:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 10:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 10:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia Dialogue 10:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete no reliable sources discuss this alleged relationship.Bali ultimate (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete The one keep vote here offers no solid grounds for why there should exist any X-Y country relations articles in the first place, let alone this one. Disk space being cheap is no reason for this encyclopedia to be clogged up with junk. C.U.T.K.D T | C 10:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.