Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dâm-Funk

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Significant coverage in reliable sources seems to have been found, demonstrating notability sufficiently for an article. ~ mazca ^talk 22:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Dâm-Funk]]=

:{{la|Dâm-Funk}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dâm-Funk}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Dâm-Funk}})

Non-notable, possibly {{tl|db-bio}}. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:38, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Keep {{tl|db-bio}}?? The New York Times [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/arts/music/26dam.html published] quite substantial article about this artist. For further evidence check the result of searching in the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=D%C3%A2m-Funk&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives G-News Archives], please. The subject easily passes WP:MUSICBIO. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Keep per Vejvančický. [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/arts/music/26dam.html?_r=1 NY Times review], [http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2010/01/27/breaking-dam-funk/ Rolling Stone review] [http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-12-02/music/dam-funk-s-dancefloor-manifesto/ SFWeekly review] = significant coverage. Public Juju ^T · C 21:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.