Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. W. Ulsterman

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:00, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

=[[:D. W. Ulsterman]]=

:{{la|D. W. Ulsterman}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/D._W._Ulsterman Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|D. W. Ulsterman}})

Self-published author. We never consider these notable without significant critical attention. Possible speedy delete G11 as promotionalism . He has not been highlighted in USA today--he has been included as one of the half dozen authors listed in a column about new Kindle releases. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Delete Self publishing author who has failed to gain critical notice in the press via reviews for his work or otherwise. Not a significant or remarkable person. Fails GNG, BIO, BLP. Might be WP:TOOSOON. Also, Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion - reccomend G!! speedy delete. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 04:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Delete just as Nom and Quinn say. I searched and cannot source it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.