Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DAVIDsTEA

=[[DAVIDsTEA]]=

:{{la|DAVIDsTEA}} ([{{fullurl:DAVIDsTEA|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DAVIDsTEA}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails WP:NOTE, as per [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=YsR&q=%22DAVIDsTEA%22&cts=1244257398429&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g1 ghits]] available. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 03:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC) Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 03:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete. Not only is the subject not noteworthy, it's also an advertisement. Kpstewart (talk) 03:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete One news hit in a Montreal paper in Aug '08. No claims of notability either, the A-7 tag should have been reinstated, it was removed by the creator. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 03:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Is there any way to move it back into the sandbox? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TeaLover247 (talkcontribs) 03:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

:Response Find out how to userfy the page. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.