Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Art Beatz

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:20, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

=[[DJ Art Beatz]]=

:{{la|DJ Art Beatz}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DJ_Art_Beatz Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|DJ Art Beatz}})

Searches only revealed questionable sources. No evidence of passing either WP:MUSBIO or WP:GNG. SST flyer 01:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 01:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 01:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 01:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Delete: The usual self-promotional sites come up on a search: his Instagram site, his Facebook page, his YouTube page, his SoundCloud page, his Twitter feed, a Spotify link, an iTunes link, his Pinterest page ... The only news item that comes up is a brief "interview" that comes off of a press release and put on one of those "citizen journalist" news aggregators, of the sort debarred by WP:ROUTINE. Fails the GNG, no evidence of hitting MUSICBIO. Ravenswing 03:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete: This Dj does not have any achievement, looks more like promotion.--Fujiiy (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 03:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete. This was deleted once before in 2011. "User:NawlinWiki deleted page DJ Art Beatz (A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)". Seems not much has changed, huh? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
SNOW Delete as simply none of this has minimally better chances of a better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 03:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.