Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Baby Anne

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 05:53, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

=[[DJ Baby Anne]]=

:{{la|DJ Baby Anne}} – (View AfD)(View log · [http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd=Wikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2F{{urlencode:DJ Baby Anne}} AfD statistics])

:({{findsources|DJ Baby Anne}})

Non-notable artist. No non-trivial mention in a Google search. Article's only source is the self-published own site. Damiens.rf 23:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep. The coverage [http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=DJ|BABY|ANNE&sql=11:fbfixqljldfe~T1 here] and [http://www.dailypress.com/topic/sfe-cl-032305coveranne,0,6983542.story here] can be incorporated into the article. One of her songs, "Probe", reached the Billboard Hot Dance Maxi-Singles Sales chart in 2002.[http://books.google.com/books?id=FBAEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA27&dq=%22dj+baby+anne%22&lr=&ei=4lMYS8CeN4TUlQSsrqzqCw#v=onepage&q=%22dj%20baby%20anne%22&f=false] Also, two of her releases were on System Recordings,[http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&searchlink=DJ|BABY|ANNE&sql=11:fbfixqljldfe~T2] a label which appears to have several notable acts on its roster. One of her albums, Mixtress, reached number 12 on the Billboard Top Electronic Albums chart in 2004,[http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:fbfixqljldfe~T5] and has an Allmusic review [http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:a9frxq9sldfe here]. On the whole, there exists enough information to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO.  Gongshow Talk 00:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 00:34, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Suficient coverage exists to demonstrate notability.--Michig (talk) 17:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Snow keep. This nomination is a waste of everyones' time. WP:BEFORE would have avoided it.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep: Per Gongshow. Joe Chill (talk) 19:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. Just a suggestion -- if the nom is agreeable at this point to this closing as a snow keep (given that all others are unanimous that it is a keep), that might perhaps save some people some time.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - charting a song would seem to confer notability. Cocytus [»talk«] 22:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.