Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kamal Mustafa

:{{la|DJ Kamal Mustafa}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DJ_Kamal_Mustafa Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|DJ Kamal Mustafa}})

Vanity bio extensively edited by the subject and written in a highly promotional tone complete with unverifiable name dropping typical of these articles. Sources are thin or associated with him, everything else out there is social media and self-generated content. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete as promotional and per WP:MUSICBIO Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as a vanity, personal article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.42.237.185 (talk) 06:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
• Delete I find no evidence of notability, the primary author is treating the article as a portal to all of his work, and he sources everything he writes to his own websites and press releases. This is so even as he restores content I already deleted once because it was full of grand claims supported only by his own content elsewhere. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. Subject fails the notability guidelines for musician. The most references in the article, are either from self-published or the primary sources which is not considered to be the reliable source. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as unambiguous self-promotion by COI editor. -- BullRangifer (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
• Delete as obvious vanispamcruftisment. Guy (Help!) 17:40, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and other !votes. Obvious WP:vanispamcruftisment ukexpat (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity page. Fails GNG and is purely promotional. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 19:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.