Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNAlogy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 18:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

=[[DNAlogy]]=

:{{la|DNAlogy}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DNAlogy Stats])

:({{Find sources|DNAlogy}})

Does not appear to be an established term - only used by the (commercial) "European Center for Genetics and DNA Identification". (Proposed deletion removed by creator.) Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete. All the links I found traced back directly to this commercial operation and none were reliable sources. This might qualify for deletion as advertising -- it's not really a dictionary definition, more like a trade-mark that the company is attempting to "word-ify" with the aid of product placements like this one. Ubelowme (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is not, as claimed by the article, "a new scientific field in genetics". Instead, it is a non-notable trademark. The term has not received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 20:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.