Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaForce Dawg

:{{la|DaForce Dawg}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DaForce_Dawg Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|DaForce Dawg}})

Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Him talking about him is not ondependent of him. Reel Recon is a personal blog, not a reliable source .Releases are not on "important" label. Lacks charting, gold, rotation, awards. (note, previously at Daforce) duffbeerforme (talk) 03:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 04:08, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete as there's unlikely much for a better article. SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
• Delete The sources and external links look promotional. Fails GNG, appears promotional. Dcs002 (talk) 06:54, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Searches show it doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
• Delete – Source searches are not providing enough coverage to meet WP:BASIC / WP:MUSICBIO. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.