Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daffodil database

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

=[[Daffodil database]]=

:{{la|Daffodil database}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daffodil_database Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Daffodil database}})

Non-notable since 2010, stub like article RockyMM (talk) 08:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. RockyMM (talk) 08:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Delete. No RS present to justify stand-alone notability. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.