Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dai Pai Dong (restaurant)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

=[[Dai Pai Dong (restaurant)]]=

:{{la|Dai Pai Dong (restaurant)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dai_Pai_Dong_(restaurant) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Dai Pai Dong (restaurant)}})

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 16:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Delete Searches found very little written about this restaurant chain. I did add a link to a Kampery webpage as an external link to the article. Lacks significant coverage published in reliable sources. Gab4gab (talk) 19:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:23, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Delete The only reference is dead, and the restaurant shows nothing notable about it.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 20:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete -- no indications of notability or significance; insufficient RS to meet GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Delete per logic outlined at WP:UNOPPOSED--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.