Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dailu Party

:{{la|Dailu Party}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dailu_Party Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Dailu Party}})

A bunch of nonsense (even though I understand what the term means), no notability, does any Ukrainian know they are members of a "Dailu Party"? [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22daily+party%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=%22dailu+party%22&nfpr=1 Google search of "Dailu Party"] yields 89 results, most of them gibberish or stuff like "Wang Dailu, Party Secretary of..." Timmyshin (talk) 05:46, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

• delete as neologism/slang/dictdef. Actually unclear which as without sources it could be anything, but not an appropriate topic for an article.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 15:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
• Delete: Per nomination, WP:OR and WP:NEO.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 03:32, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
• Delete, apparent nonsense. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.