Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Partridge

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 13:43, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Dale Partridge]]=

:{{la|Dale Partridge}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dale_Partridge Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Dale Partridge}})

Piece has strongly promotional tone, despite having cleaned out the large number of inappropriate external links. Additionally, the focus of the supplied sources appears to be Partridge's business Sevenly rather than Partridge himself. Given that, the notability of the article's subject appears, in my eyes, to be distinctly borderline and worth consulting the community about. Dolescum (talk) 03:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. The focus is indeed far more on Sevenly than on Partridge. The sources are about the success story of the store and most of them are about Apple or other companies and based mainly on interviews. A promotional piece masquerding as a bio. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Lack of material and lack of importance. DGG ( talk ) 16:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.