Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damon Weaver

:{{la|Damon Weaver}} ([{{fullurl:Damon Weaver|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damon Weaver}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Damon Weaver}})

An 11 year old student interviewed the president and had a brief media run. While maybe the coverage had some buzz, this is not a notable event, and the BLP standards should be strict in this case. Shadowjams (talk) 22:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

:Strong Support. Per the nominating argument. Therequiembellishere (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

• Delete, WP:BLP1E. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC).
• Delete per nom. Although I've edited this article, it is now obvious that this a case of recentism. Delete w/o prejudice against re-creation in the event that he becomes notable beyond his recent "15 mins. of fame".--JayJasper (talk) 19:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Novelty isn't notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.